YAKIMA, Wash. – The Yakima City Council is poised to review its camping ban in light of a recent Supreme Court decision that has sparked nationwide debate on homelessness and public space use.
The decision in Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson has prompted cities across the country to reassess their ordinances regarding outdoor camping bans, particularly their impact on homeless populations.
“Our local camping ordinance aligns with Boise standards,” stated Yakima City Attorney Sara Watkins. “It prohibits camping or setting up camp facilities on city streets, sidewalks, parking lots, or any city-owned land.”
Referencing the 2019 Boise v. Martin case, which emphasizes directing homeless individuals to housing resources rather than punitive measures, Yakima officials have been proactive in outreach efforts.
“We see this as an opportunity to engage with non-compliant individuals before resorting to enforcement actions,” explained Yakima Police Department’s Interim Chief Shawn Boyle. “Overall, we anticipate minimal changes in our enforcement approach to camping laws.”
At a recent City Council meeting on June 9, discussions revolved around potential adjustments to the existing ordinance in response to the Supreme Court ruling.
“Since the court’s decision, there’s been keen interest in how this will impact local enforcement strategies,” noted Deputy Mayor Matt Brown.
One proposal floated during the meeting was to remove the requirement for police to confirm shelter availability before enforcing the camping ban.
“As affirmed by the Supreme Court, these ordinances are tools for municipalities,” Watkins commented. “Yakima has a range of tools at its disposal, including our unlawful camping ordinance.”
Mike Kay, CEO of Camp Hope, expressed cautious optimism about potential ordinance changes, foreseeing initial community concerns.
“While there may be apprehension about increased enforcement, I trust our local law enforcement to prioritize assistance over punitive measures,” Kay remarked. “Our focus remains on guiding individuals toward shelter options.”
City Council emphasized that any revisions to the ordinance would undergo thorough deliberation and require formal adoption at upcoming council sessions.